This website is part of the ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) network
ECDC logo
Contact Sitemap Links RSS feeds
Font:
Accessibility
 
European Center for Disease Prevention and Control






Go to extranet
   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
About Us
Activities
Health Topics
Publications
Media Centre
You are here: Skip Navigation LinksECDC Portal > English > Activities > Surveillance > EUVACnet > Surveillance > Measles trends

 EPIS
 
Skip navigation links
About the network
Case definitions
Surveillance
Surveillance reports
Measles trends
Status of measles reporting 2012
Measles maps
Rubella trends
Status of rubella reporting
Rubella map
Vaccination schedules
National plans
Measles trends  

 Measles trends, by country

Belgium reported the number of measles cases from the French-speaking part of the country in 2001. No reports were received in 2002.

Data available from 2005 onwards

Data available from 2005 onwards.

Data available from 2005 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2005 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

France commenced case-based reporting in 2005. Prior to that only data from sentinal surveillance system was available. The data, however, are not presented here.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2005 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards. Zero cases of measles reported.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2005 onwards.

Data available from 2005 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2005 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2005 onwards.

Data available from 2005 onwards. Zero cases of measles reported.

Data available from 2005 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.

Data available from 2001 onwards.
Comments: Comparisons between countries should be made with caution because of dissimilar surveillance sensitivities, completeness of reporting and different reporting procedures—some countries reported only laboratory-confirmed cases whereas others reported clinical cases without laboratory confirmation. Moreover, under-notification is a well recognised limitation of nationwide mandatory notification systems. Any imported cases are included. More information is found in the annual measles surveillance reports for2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010.
   Share