Hepatitis B prevalence database
Prevalence data from sources such as population surveys can be a useful complement to case based surveillance data for hepatitis B. Case-based surveillance has limitations as most diagnosed cases are chronic in nature and detection of cases depends largely on testing practices. Prevalence data can therefore contribute towards a fuller understanding of the epidemiology of hepatitis B.
Populations covered by this database
Men who have sex with men
First-time blood donors
Studies covering the general population, men who have sex with men (MSM), pregnant women and prisoners were extracted from a previously published systematic review
Studies on migrants were extracted from the systematic review on hepatitis B and C among migrants
Data on prevalence of Hepatitis B and C in first time blood donors were obtained from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) of the Council of Europe
Information on prevalence of Hepatitis B among people who inject drugs can be found on the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) website
Some populations are not mutually exclusive e.g. Prison population has a high representation PWID and PWID studies may have been conducted in prisons.
Prevalence is determined by the detection of HBsAg. Some studies may report other testing but the results are not included in the database in its current form.
The database will be updated biannually. The next update is scheduled for 2020 when studies published in 2018 and 2019 will be added. The database will always cover the most recent ten years of data.
Inclusion of particular studies in this website does not necessarily represent endorsement by the ECDC. Reports were reviewed for quality, but not all data presented here are of equal quality. Users are encouraged to use the links provided to the original publications when interpreting the results.
An ad hoc risk of bias framework as developed by the original ECDC review team as described in the published systematic review. This framework assessed different domains across populations. See further information under ‘Risk of Bias’ in the Glossary or review of the method in the published systematic review.
There could be a long time lag between data collection and publication.
Users can control and/or delete cookies, delete all cookies that are already on their computers and set most browsers to prevent them from being placed. None of these actions affect the functionalities of this tool.
If you have any questions related to this tool, email us.