Diphtheria - Annual Epidemiological Report 2016 [2014 data]

publication surveillance report
Publication series: Annual Epidemiological Report on Communicable Diseases in Europe
Time period covered: 01/01/2014 - 31/12/2014
Cite:
Citation Link

Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual Epidemiological Report 2016 – Diphtheria.

Copy citation to clipboard

In 2014, 38 cases of diphtheria were reported to TESSy, 35 of which were laboratory confirmed as due to C. diphtheriae or C. ulcerans.

Download

Key facts

  • In 2014, 38 cases of diphtheria were reported to TESSy, 35 of which were laboratory confirmed as due to C. diphtheriae or C. ulcerans.
  • Adults and elderly were the most affected.
  • The majority of the cases were not vaccinated or the vaccination status was reported as unknown.
  • Latvia was the only country in the EU to report indigenous cases.
  • High vaccination coverage must be sustained to prevent diphtheria cases.

Methods

Click here for a detailed description of the methods used to produce this annual report

ECDC has coordinated the surveillance of diphtheria at the EU level since the transfer of DIPNET, the Diphtheria Surveillance Network, to ECDC in 2010. DIPNET used to be hosted at the UK Health Protection Agency.

  • In 2014, 30 EU/EEA Member States reported data. Nine countries reported cases due to C. diphtheriae or C. ulcerans, and 21 countries reported zero cases.
  • The majority of Member States reported data on diphtheria according to the 2008 (n=13) or 2012 (n=11) EU case definition. Five countries used an alternative or unspecified case definition. Regardless of the case definition used, only cases caused by, or with a clinical syndrome consistent with causation by, toxigenic strains are reported at the EU level (Commission Implementing Decision 2012/506/EU of 8 August 2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council).
  • All reporting countries have a surveillance system for diphtheria and reported case-based data. Clinical and laboratory-notified cases were linked at the national level and submitted to TESSy with a single record identifier. The majority of the countries reported data based on a comprehensive (n=30) and compulsory (n=29) surveillance system. For a summary of national surveillance systems characteristics by country, please refer to the Annex.

Epidemiology

Thirty-eight cases of diphtheria were reported in 2014 (Table 1, Figure 1), 35 of which were laboratory confirmed as due to C. diphtheriae (n=22) or C. ulcerans, (n=13). The overall notification rate was <0.01 per 100 000 population. Additionally, Latvia reported three cases as possible C. diphtheriae respiratory infections. Of the 22 confirmed C. diphtheriae cases, Latvia reported the highest number (n=10) and was the only EU Member State with continued indigenous transmission. Diphtheria caused by C. ulcerans accounted for 13 cases and was reported by Germany (n=5), France (n=5), Italy (n=1), Sweden (n=1) and the United Kingdom (n=1).

From 2010 to 2014, 131 cases of diphtheria were reported in the EU/EEA; 76 of these cases were laboratory-confirmed C. diphtheriae infections. The number of C. diphtheriae cases reported over the last four years increased, especially in Latvia (n=42, 38 of these cases were laboratory confirmed).

Discussion

Diphtheria is a transmissible bacterial disease primarily infecting the pharynx, larynx, tonsils and nose. Occasionally, the bacteria affects skin or mucous membranes including conjunctivae and the vagina.

The causative agent of diphtheria is Corynebacterium diphtheriae transmitted through droplets during close contact. The bacterium produces a toxin that can cause severe complications. Systemic toxicity occurs in 8.1% of diphtheria patients, which may lead to severe complications such myocarditis, neuropathies, renal failure and eventually death.

Other corynebacteria, C. ulcerans and very rarely C. pseudotuberculosis, may produce the diphtheria toxin, although the strains appear to belong to distinct species and have different routes of transmission [1].

Diphtheria case detection is strongly influenced by the availability of laboratory resources (techniques and supplies), clinical expertise and surveillance systems. As ECDC surveillance data and EQA reports have shown, the availability of these resources seems to be unevenly distributed in Europe, and very few countries perform toxigenicity testing [2].

It is likely that countries that reported cases in consecutive years (Austria, France, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom) have acquired stronger expertise and laboratory capacity for detecting and confirming diphtheria cases than countries that did not detect and report cases. C ulcerans infections were reported by Germany, France, Italy, Sweden and the United Kingdom, perhaps suggesting a higher level of awareness of this pathogen in these countries [3].

While in 2010 only three C. diphtheriae cases were reported, ECDC received information on 22 confirmed cases in 2014.

Latvia is the only EU Member State with continued indigenous transmission, probably due to decreasing adult booster coverage [4]. Though the clinical presentation was not always reported, a notable increase of cases was reported with cutaneous manifestation, mainly among adult travellers.

Because the risks of transmission from cases with respiratory or cutaneous forms continue, particularly in countries outside the EU, high vaccination coverage must be maintained [5,6].

European travellers may become infected and develop cutaneous diphtheria while travelling or working in endemic countries. ECDC data show that most of the imported cases had not received booster vaccinations before travelling. If travellers are not vaccinated and are exposed to overcrowding and poor hygienic conditions, they are at potential risk for acquiring diphtheria and of transmitting the infection on their return [6].

The diphtheria toxoid vaccine effectively protects against the effects of the exotoxin produced by C. diphtheriae, and immunisation is the only effective method of preventing the toxin-mediated disease. Since the reported vaccination coverage is high in Europe, the threat of a widespread outbreak is unlikely, but sporadic cases may continue to occur in unvaccinated or partially vaccinated individuals [5,7,8].

Public health conclusions

Enhanced diphtheria surveillance with high data completeness must be maintained. Also, early medical diagnosis (clinical recognition and laboratory confirmation) and treatment should be in place. As early administration of diphtheria antitoxin (DAT) is essential for survival, countries must maintain the capacity for rapid investigation and management of close contacts of cases. Not all EU countries have their own stocks of DAT, thus timely transfer of available stocks to affected countries is essential; arrangements need to be in place to ensure that the transfer of DAT stocks is possible on short notice [5,8].

Maintaining high vaccination coverage in the population is critical, and measures should be taken to improve vaccination coverage rates in under-vaccinated populations and certain risk groups (e.g. travellers planning to go to endemic areas and contacts of unvaccinated travellers returning from endemic areas, overcrowded closed groups of people under poor hygienic conditions, unvaccinated clusters and the elderly [6]. Particular attention should also be given to revaccination of healthcare and social workers due to waning immunity, revaccination of adult population against diphtheria every 10 years might be considered [9].

References

  1. Kasper DL, Fauci AS, editors. Harrison's infectious diseases. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.
  2. Both L, Neal S, De Zoysa A, Mann G, Czumbel I, Efstratiou A. External quality assessments for microbiologic diagnosis of diphtheria in Europe. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Dec;52(12):4381-4 .
  3. Hacker E, Antunes CA, Mattos-Guaraldi AL, Burkovski A, Tauch A. Corynebacterium ulcerans, an emerging human pathogen. Future Microbiol. 2016 Aug 22.
  4. Wagner KS, White JM, Lucenko I, Mercer D, Crowcroft NS, Neal S, et al. Diphtheria in the postepidemic period, Europe, 2000–2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Feb;18(2):217-25.
  5. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. A case of diphtheria in Spain, 15 June 2015. Stockholm: ECDC; 2015.
  6. Jablonka A BG, Stange M, Dopfer C, Grote U, Hansen G, Schmidt RE, Happle C. Tetanus and diphtheria immunity in refugees in Europe in 2015. Infection 2016 Aug 19. 2016.
  7. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Cutaneous diphtheria among recently arrived refugees and asylum seekers in the EU, 30 July 2015. Stockholm: ECDC; 2015.
  8. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. A fatal case of diphtheria in Belgium, 24 March 2016. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016.
  9. Diphtheria vaccine – WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2006 Jan 20;81(03):24-31. English, French. No abstract available. Available from: http://www.who.int/wer/2006/wer8103.pdf.

Annex

Table. Diphtheria, surveillance systems overview, 2014

More about surveillance for diphteria

Publication

Vaccine-preventable diseases - Annual epidemiological report 2014 [2012 data]

surveillance report -

Publication

External quality assessment scheme for diphtheria diagnostics, 2013

technical report, external quality assessment -

Publication

Evaluation and assessment of serological immunity methods and EQA scheme of Diphtheria

technical report, external quality assessment -

Data

Surveillance Atlas of Infectious Diseases

tool